1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 1990년 경부터 강원 홍천군 C에서 ‘D’ 이라는 상호의 돈사( 豚舍, 이하 ‘ 이 사건 돈사’ 라 한다 )를 운영하면서 양돈업에 종사하는 사람이다.

On December 2, 2008, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry implemented the "project for modernization of livestock facilities in 2009" (hereinafter "project in this case") in order to promote the reduction of livestock death and the improvement of productivity through the improvement of livestock shed facilities in response to the simultaneous diversified FTA, including the Korea-U.S. FTA, and the resumption of DDA negotiations, etc. (hereinafter "the project in this case") around December 2008, the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry provided 30% of the total project cost as subsidies, and provided that 50% of the total project cost shall be financed through financial institutions on condition of repayment 3% per annum and 10 years per five years per annum, and 20% shall be borne voluntarily.

On April 27, 2009, the Defendant was selected as a business operator of the instant project with a view to promoting the project for modernization of the instant money company’s facilities (construction and installation of feed automation facilities) by carrying out the project cost of KRW 67,130,00 (i.e., financing KRW 20,139,565,000 at the national expense of KRW 33,426,000).

After doing so, the Defendant: (a) conducted a construction work to improve the facilities of the instant money; and (b) on January 2010, at the Cheongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, Hongcheon-gun, the Defendant issued a total of KRW 67,642,00 won for labor expenses (i.e., labor expenses of KRW 8,050,000 for materials expenses of KRW 59,592,00 for materials expenses of KRW 59,592,00 for agricultural subsidies); and (c) applied for a subsidy to grant the “report on the completion of the project for the modernization of the livestock shed facilities of this case for the improvement of the instant money; and (d) submitted F, G, and H as a member of the Corporation for the improvement of the Fund; and (e) submitted a receipt to the said person to provide labor expenses of KRW 8,050,000 for KRW 23,2500.

However, there was no fact that the Defendant paid the labor cost of KRW 4.8 million in total to G and H (= G 2.3 million KRW H 2.5 million).

As such, the Defendant shall be E.