A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

To order the accused to complete a sexual assault treatment program for 100 hours.

Punishment of the crime

From around 05:40 on May 23, 2018 to around 05:50 on the same day, the Defendant openly imprisoned a female publicly obscene act with DNA and his/her employees, from the inside and outside of the C convenience store store located in Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, with his/her employees from around 05:50 on the same day.

On June 25, 2018, the Defendant, “2018 Highest 1828, the Defendant, at around 20:00 G singings operated by the Victim F, who was in the relationship in South-dong E, Nam-gu, Namcheon-gu, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s singinging operations by force by force by preventing customers from entering the singing room, such as the vehicle, etc. for 20 minutes on the ground that the victim does not take the floor, and by allowing them to enter the singing room.

Summary of Evidence

"2018 Highest 1314"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. D's self-written statement;

1. “Ctv video screen to the suspect form and the site convenience store at the time of hearing”: “2018 upper end 1828;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of F's self-culbing legislation;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 245 of the Criminal Act (the point of obscenity in a public performance), Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order, that the defendant led to the confession and reflect of each of the crimes in this case, that the victim of the obstruction of business in this case does not have to impose any punishment on the defendant, on the other hand, in light of the circumstances leading up to each of the crimes in this case and how to commit any of the crimes in this case and how to commit any of the crimes in violence or interference with business, and that the defendant was punished by each of the fines around 2001, around 201, around 201, around 201, around 2015, around 2015, around 2015, around 2016, and on September 11, 2017, he/she was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a crime of interference with the performance of official duties on the part of September 11, 2017.