A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On September 29, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of suspended sentence for six months of imprisonment with prison labor for an unreffortual crime in the Daejeon District Court’s Support for the Dissolution of the Daejeon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 11, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On April 15, 201, 201, the Defendant was punished by the Defendant’s report filed by the Defendant and C in a divorce proceeding at around 22:01, 108 Dong-dong 108, 902, and the Defendant’s report filed by the Defendant and C, despite that C was not in the house at the time, the Defendant was aware of his body with his body of the Defendant, holding a benda window and her body in the face of his body with his body unfolded, and then intending to get out of the C’s clothes.

1. Extraordinary도요.

The 112 Declaration was filed as soon as possible.

In this respect, the defendant made a false accusation for the purpose of having C receive criminal punishment.

2. On May 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) made a false complaint to the public service center of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station located in Seosan-si, Seosan-si, Seosan-si, to the effect that “A, the Defendant, who is the Defendant, displayed his husband C, etc. while investigating the complainant A on April 3, 2017, questioning the complainant, and submitted the above complaint to the police officer, who was unable to know his name, despite indicating the name of the complainant C’s photograph and signing and sealing it in the suspect interrogation protocol, who was signed and sealed by the complainant.” (b) written a false complaint to the effect that “A was punished as if he had forged the above suspect interrogation protocol,” and submitted the above complaint to the police officer, who was unable to know his name.

However, in fact, E did not have any fact that the defendant examined the defendant by showing C's cover photographs, and after obtaining the defendant's signature and seal, E did not modify the above suspect interrogation protocol.

In this respect, the defendant made a false accusation against E for the purpose of having the criminal punishment imposed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The suspect interrogation protocol for E and C of each police officer.