A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The indictment was revised ex officio.

From October 2017, the Defendant was a person working at the logistics center in the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, with the knowledge of the security system of the above logistics center, and used it well-known to steal the goods owned by the victim, which are located in the goods display stand.

1. On November 1, 2019, the Defendant: (a) took three traffic cards equivalent to the total market value of KRW 2,850,000, which is the victim’s possession, located in the display stand of the goods at the above logistics center by taking advantage of the gaps of its employees’ surveillance; (b) 2,850,000; (c) two smart beam lines; (d) three Hphones; and (e) one compact number of the compacts with the fourth floor of the above logistics center; and (d) taken away from the above logistics center, taken away the goods away from the floor.

From February 19, 2020 to February 07:40, the Defendant stolen goods worth KRW 17,154,200, total market price, which is the victim’s ownership, by the same method, on seven occasions, as shown in attached Table 1.

2. At around 8:00 on Nov. 22, 2019, the Defendant attempted to steal three of the instant victim-owned share of KRW 1,514,630, a total market value of the said victim-owned premises at the place indicated in the said paragraph 1-A, using the same method as the description stated in the said paragraph 1-A, even though the Defendant attempted to steal the said three of the instant victim-owned share of KRW 1,514,630, a total market value of the said victim-owned premises, and the portable blus spacker, a security guard who was patroled at the place, was discovered, and did not commit an attempted crime.

From that time to November 30, 2019, the Defendant attempted to steals goods worth KRW 8,263,710, which are the victim’s ownership, on three occasions through the same method, as indicated in attached Table 2, between November 30, 2019 and November 30, 2019, but failed to achieve such intent for the same reason.

3. On November 22, 2019, the Defendant entering a building: (a) around 7:32 on November 22, 2019; and (b) passing through the entrance door of the first floor by using a certificate of access, which had been kept in custody of stolen goods, from the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (1).