1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part concerning the monetary claim against Defendant C, E, and F is modified as follows.

Defendant C, E, and F.

1. The part excluding the conclusion in the reasoning of the court's explanation as to this case is excluded from the grounds of this case by the court of the first instance. All of the "witness witness" and "the result of Defendant E's personal examination" of the first instance court and "the result of Defendant E's personal examination of the first instance court" are deleted from both "the witness of the first instance court" and "the result of Defendant E's personal examination of the first instance court", and the 7th 5th th th 5th th th th th th th th th th th above" of the first instance court are deleted from "the same as that of the first instance court'

2. This Court shall apply to the portion added or used by this Court during the following period: (a) the 7th day of the first instance judgment from 12 to 9th day of the first instance judgment:

“C. Determination 1 as to the claim for money against Defendant B and D 1) Even if Defendant B delivered the instant building for the first lease to the Plaintiff around November 21, 201 upon the termination of the instant first lease contract, if the first lease contract was not terminated, Defendant B still has the obligation to pay the rent, and thus, we examine the termination of the instant first lease contract at any time.

According to Gap evidence No. 3, the plaintiff and defendant Eul can recognize the fact that "if the tenant prior to the expiration of the contract term wishes to cancel, he/she shall give prior notice in writing to the landlord one month prior to the expiration of the contract term (Article 8), and if the tenant fails to express his/her intention in writing by one month prior to the expiration of the contract term, this contract term shall be deemed renewed by one year (Article 7)." Thus, there is no evidence to prove that the defendant Eul notified the plaintiff that he/she would cancel the first lease contract of this case before February 16, 2013, the expiration of the contract term of this case, and there is no separate declaration of intention in writing by one month prior to the expiration of the contract term of this case.