1. The judgment of the first instance, including the claims extended in the trial, shall be modified as follows:

Defendant:

A. The plaintiff A, B.

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is examined as follows. Thus, this case is quoted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Judgment of the Supreme Court Decision 2015Da75179 Decided May 10, 2019 and Supreme Court Decision 2016Da56045, 56052 (combined), 56069 (Joint), 56076 (Joint), and 56083 (Joint) Decided May 10, 2019). The Defendant’s argument regarding ordinary wages and the good faith principle cannot be accepted in light of the aforementioned decisions. On the 12th page “The above money” was written by the following formula.

“The amount of money” in the attached Form 2 of this Judgment is as follows: The method of calculation and the result of the calculation, including the part of the claim extended by the plaintiff BT in the trial, shall not be disputed between the plaintiffs and the defendant.

Therefore, as the plaintiffs seek, the defendant shall pay to the plaintiffs A, B, D, E, F, G, H, I, and J each of the money stated in the "amount of discount" column for each plaintiff in the attached Form 2 of this Judgment, and as to each of them, 6% per annum under the Commercial Act from January 1, 2015 to August 24, 2015, which is the delivery date of a copy of the complaint in this case; 15% per annum from the next day to the full payment date; 2,469,257 won per annum from the next day to the first instance judgment; 17,83,042 won to the plaintiff B; 2,469,257 won per annum from the next day to the 15th day of the judgment; 10% per annum from October 13, 2015 to the delivery date of a copy of the claim claim in this case; 2,15% per annum from the 15th day to the 15th day of the above judgment; 2, 15th day from 15th day to the above.