1. The judgment of the first instance, including the plaintiff's claim extended by this court, shall be modified as follows:

The defendants are the defendants.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: "The Seodaemun-gu of the defendant is used in accordance with Article 9 (1) of the Civil Procedure Act" in Section 8-16 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "Article 9 (1) of the same Act," and Articles 8-20 through 9-5 of the same Act are as follows. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is stated in the reasoning of the judgment, except for the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendants as set forth in Paragraph 2 below. Thus, it is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[3] Meanwhile, barring any special circumstance, the Plaintiff suffered losses from the Plaintiff’s payment of KRW 2,241,825,850 under the name of school site charges. As to KRW 2,241,825,850 as well as KRW 21,00,00,00,000, which is the winning amount of the first instance judgment, from August 22, 2014 to April 6, 2018, the Plaintiff paid the said amount, 5% per annum under the Civil Act from the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case to April 16, 2018, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the date of full payment, Article 3(1) of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning Expedition, etc. of Legal Proceedings, Article 3(1)2 of the former Enforcement Decree No. 9768, May 21, 2019; Article 3(15) of the former Act No.581.

A person shall be appointed.

2. The defendants.