1. The part of the instant lawsuit seeking revocation of the refusal to grant permission to extend the period of sojourn shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 28, 2011, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea as a short-term general (C31) qualification and departs from the Republic of Korea on May 27, 2011. On July 25, 2012, the Plaintiff re-entry into the Republic of Korea as a short-term general (C31) qualification on July 25, 201 and changed to the qualification for visiting employment (H26) on October 31, 2012, and the period of stay expires on October 30, 2015.

B. At around 03:30 on November 12, 2014, the Plaintiff received a summary order of KRW 500,000 from the Busan District Court Branch on December 17, 2014 to a police officer working there without any justifiable reason after using toilets within the zone of the Busan District Police Station, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, Seocheon-gu, Seoul, and without complying with the police officer's eviction, such as tobacco and satho, telephone, inside the immigration control office, arbitra, and satho, and continued to engage in an act of disturbance within the boundary of the district, which is a government office, without complying with the police officer's eviction due to continuous noise in Korean, and the said summary order became final and conclusive at that time.

C. At around 00:10 on January 6, 2015, the Plaintiff assaulted the victim, who was a taxi engineer, to pay taxi charges on the front of Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, by drinking alcohol, and without any justifiable reason, the victim’s arms and descendants. The Seoul Geumcheon Police Station, who was dispatched to the scene after receiving the victim’s 112 report, notified the summary of the crime, the reason for arrest, and the right to appoint a defense counsel, and arrested the police officer as a flagrant offender of the crime of assault. The Plaintiff, on May 14, 2015, assaulted the police officer’s body and interfered with the legitimate performance of duties regarding the criminal investigation by assaulting the police officer, such as walking the body bridge and walking the bridge to the bridge, thereby obstructing the police officer’s performance of duties by obstruction of performance of official duties, assaulting him for six months at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

On October 5, 2015, the Plaintiff applied to the Defendant for permission to extend the period of stay.