logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.09.17 2017고단642
업무상과실치사
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.

However, the execution of each of the above penalties for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B was the first medical department of the hospital located in Seocho-gu Seoul (hereinafter “instant hospital”) in Seocho-gu, Seoul. Defendant A was the first medical specialist in the first medical department of the instant hospital, and Defendant A was the first medical specialist in the first medical department of the instant hospital. E was the second medical doctor in the first medical department of the instant hospital, and the victim F (the male and the age of 52 at the time) was the patient who was within the first medical department of the said hospital in the second medical department of the instant hospital.

On March 21, 2014, around 21:38, the victim was the time shown in CCTV of the instant hospital, and the view below all was specified on the basis of CCTV.

As a result of the diagnosis of the victim, E who was in an emergency room at the time was in the emergency room of the above hospital, and was in the emergency room of the victim, and was in the emergency room of the above hospital, after the diagnosis of the victim, after the victim was identified as acute chiefitis, performed the supply of a musta, through a musta line and a mountain hexack, and administered dex slex slex slin and flamine slin, which are drugs to alleviate the side species of the patient in the respiratory difficulties, and completed the X-ray shooting on the part of the above part, and requested the defendant B to provide treatment for the victim at around 22:23 of the same day.

Defendant

B, while examining the symptoms of the victim, after receiving a report from E on the symptoms of the victim, the victim was examined without viewing the victim's verbal diagnosis records, diagnosis car and X-ray photographs, and the victim's oxygen fall short of the level of oxygen and the symptoms of respiratory disorder worsen, the victim requested the victim A, who is the person in charge of emergency room, to treat the victim at around 2:38 on the same day.

Defendant

A received a report on the symptoms of the victim from B, and without seeing the victim's medical records, diagnosis car and X-ray photographs, A conducted three times with Defendant B in order to supply oxygen to the victim, but failed both, and thereafter, provided the victim with oxygens by implementing the leapprocing therapy (the procedure to directly cut the le and supply the oxygen to prevent the leapcopic closure).

arrow