1. Each of the plaintiffs' claims is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiffs are the spouses and children of the deceased D (E) and the defendant is a corporation that operates Samsung Seoul Hospital (Defendant Hospital).

B. D had undergone an artificial heart stop operation at the Defendant Hospital on August 20, 2011, and thereafter had undergone an artificial heart stop operation at the Defendant Hospital on April 1, 2013 with infectious infection, and had undergone an operation to remove ews and replace the plate at the Defendant Hospital on April 1, 2013, and used an anti-specin as an anti-specin.

C. On October 10, 2015, D applied to the emergency room of the Defendant hospital as heat and respiratory distress symptoms. As a result of the examination, the Defendant hospital’s medical personnel administered the hedging, which is an anti-zine, along with the anti-zine treatment.

After that, due to the occurrence of cerebrovascular and cerebral hemopsis, she suspended her hemopher, administered her Toluene and performed herthophical surgery, which is an instrument under brain pressure, but D died on October 31, 2015.

Grounds for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, Gap 5-1 through 5, the results of each request for appraisal of medical records, the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs' assertion 1) A medical personnel at the defendant hospital had a tendency to blood transfusion as a result of blood examination when they were located in the emergency department of the defendant hospital, and the blood transfusion was observed, and as a result of the CT test, the cerebral cerebral d has deteriorated due to negligence that continued to administer the hedging, which is an anti-hour anti-accident system. 2) A medical personnel at the defendant hospital caused d to death due to d's abnormal cerebral cerebral d's symptoms, such as symptoms with bad climatic loss and force, severe thromatic d's symptoms, and symptoms of cerebral tension and brain damage caused by this, but the medical personnel at the defendant hospital immediately conducted the brain tracking test, the cerebral d's surgery, and the cerebral d's surgery, and the cerebral d's surgery.

B. Comprehensively taking account of each of the medical record appraisal opinions of appraiser F, whether there was a negligence related to the determination 1 response administration, D’s blood plate value at the time of hospitalization in the Defendant hospital was reduced compared to normal conditions.