logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.04.05 2017고단3775
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 00:40 on October 10, 2017, the Defendant expressed a desire to “D” convenience store in Songpa-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (29 tax) for the victim C (hereinafter “D”), who works as an employee, and that the previous tobacco purchased is not operated properly, and the victim expressed a desire to see that “the electronic tobacco purchased before is not operated properly, ring off, ring off, and throw off,” and she laid down the electronic tobacco device on the floor, such as cutting off the device on the floor, so that the victim would get out, and interfere with the victim’s convenience store business for about 30 minutes by force by force.

The Defendant, on November 1, 2017, from around 01:02 to 01:40 on the same day, at D convenience stores located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, Seoul, the Defendant requested refund of the electronic tobacco purchased at that place. In order to obtain refund of the electronic tobacco, the Defendant demanded the victim C (29 years of age) who was an employee to visit again and receive the refund of the tobacco. The Defendant called “the head of occupation.” The Defendant called the victim to “the head of occupation.” The victim called the victim to the head of the occupation, but called the victim, who reported the fact that the victim was not a telephone, expressed the victim’s desire to take care of the victim, such as “grings, shots,” and the customer who found the place “I do not engage in female business.”

An article shall be up-to-board.

"................ ......... ......

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the convenience store business of the victimized person by force between approximately 40 minutes.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 3775"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. A investigative report (CCTV verification) 2017 Highest 3991;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of CCTV image photograph Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse.

arrow