logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.24 2014고정1824
도박
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2013. 7. 11.부터 20.까지 5 ~ 6회에 걸쳐 필리핀 C 소재 D호텔 카지노, E호텔 카지노, F 카지노를 돌아다니며 슬롯머신(똑같은 그림이 나오는 숫자에 따라 10배까지 배당금이 나오는 도박 기계), 바카라(카드 2장을 받아 그 카드 숫자를 더해 9에 가까운 쪽이 이기는 방식), 블랙잭(카드를 받아 21에 가까운 쪽이 이기는 방식)을 하는 등 총 2,700만 원 상당의 도박자금으로 수회 도박을 하였다.

2. Determination

A. First, the police interrogation protocol (six pages of investigation record) of the defendant submitted by the prosecutor as evidence is inadmissible as long as the defendant denies its contents in this court.

B. Next, the part of the witness G’s statement to the effect that “at the time of the investigation, the Defendant heards the Defendant’s statement with the same content as the facts charged” in the legal statement of the witness G, a police officer who investigated the Defendant as a suspect prior to the prosecution of the instant case, cannot be deemed to have been made under “ particularly reliable condition” when the Defendant’s statement was made at the time of the investigation in light of the following facts or circumstances acknowledged by the instant evidence, and there is no other evidence that may otherwise recognize it, and thus,

(1) In this court, the Defendant returned home from July 1, 2013 to July 20, 2013.

After July 29, 2013, one person H was arrested and detained by another and another Korean person.

On August 4, 2013, it was possible to return home and abroad from them.

They, when they are under investigation in Korea, forced them to make a statement while making their statements, and forced them to make a statement as they are, at the time of the police investigation, as instructed by them, but are so stated.

A statement that did not have been given is part of the statement.

arrow