The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant only made a fighting match and did not take a bath to the police officer who called upon receiving a report, but the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged in the instant case.

2. Determination

A. The victim G, who was dispatched at the time of the instant crime, as a police officer belonging to the Chungcheong Police Station, was present as a witness in the court of the court below at the time of the instant crime, was called as “the victim G, who was called up at the time of the instant crime, was present at the court of the court below, and was called up with four police officers at the same time, so that H, who was called up by the Defendant and the Defendant, at the time of E, was put up in the back to the following. Therefore, as the Defendant, who was to remove the Defendant’s arms, moved out a cell phone as the Defendant was plplleed by a police officer, and stated that “the internal sentence shall not be broken up, which is located in the Seoul Regional Office.”

B. H was present as a witness in the trial court, and stated that “C is her her buck with E, thereby leaving his left shoulder, and G was removed from the Defendant’s arms. The Defendant stated that “I will not keep the Defendant’s arms. I will not see our punishment, and I will remove this son’s neck.” In line with the victim’s statement.

C. At the time of investigation by the police, E stated in the court of the court below that “A police officer was able to take a bath during the process of speaking for a fighting with a police officer called for a fighting, and no person would have taken a bath accurately because there is no warning at the time.”

I, in the court of the court below, did not understand the motion picture of this case as being taken by the Defendant with cell phone without any fighting prior to the dispatch of the police by the Defendant.

E resisted during the course of assaulting from C.