The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the Defendant unilaterally committed an assault against the victim and the victim’s birth and did not commit an injury to the victim, but the lower court convicted the victim of the facts charged of this case.

2. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the following circumstances are recognized.

1) At the time of the police investigation, the victim stated that “The victim went to the front parking lot of the first floor guard room in the ELrabeter after having falbbbbling with the Defendant and having falbbbbing with her face.” The Defendant saw her hand by hand his hand, and the Defendant did her hand.” The court below made a statement in the court below that “The Defendant falbling the Defendant’s hand in the process of attacking his body with the Defendant, she tried not to get his hand and tried to get his hand away. At the time, the victim himself only falbing her hand.” At the time of the police investigation and the court below consistently stated that “E, the victim’s mother, was fighting with the Defendant and the victim’s body from before her house to the first floor guard room and the first floor room, and continued to fighting one’s body.”

3) At the time, J observed the instant case before the victim’s house. At the lower court court, two persons (the Defendant and the victim) argued that they were arguing in the said case with each other’s shoulder, and only one person (E was said to have fighting. F and G, a staff member of the management office of the instant apartment, stated in the lower court that they were in fighting, such as the Defendant and the victim’s bomb and bomb, etc., and they were in the middle of E. F and G directly observed the situation at the front parking lot of the first floor guard room at the time.