The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Although the summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) did not interfere with the victim's business by force, the court below found the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts and affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. We examine the judgment of the court below. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below. In other words, the victims and the co-defendants of the court below, which are small amount of money in the I parking lot operated by the victim G at the police station, appear on May 1, 2015; May 2, 2015; and May 4, 2015; they stated that they would operate the parking lot; they would make their parking lot; they stated that they made a statement that they would go to their parking; that they made a statement that they would go back to the parking lot; that, due to this reason, they made a statement by the police of the court below that they did not park the victims with their employees on the wind of parking; that they did not return their parking lot to the police station; that they did not return to the defendant's own parking lot, and that they did not return to the police station's own parking lot because they did not interfere with the defendant's duty of parking.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion of mistake is without merit.

3. Conclusion.