The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The lower court deemed that the Defendant operated the private sports territory site “C” from April 1, 2015 to April 30, 2016. However, the period during which the Defendant jointly operated the said site is limited to approximately two months from the end of February 2016 to the management office for the remainder of the period.

B. The sentence of the judgment of the court below on unreasonable sentencing (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the court below, i.e., (i) the G apartment site operated by neighboring offices in the G apartment site promotion of China before August 2015 (Evidence No. 9 of the evidence record) stated that the police officer stated that the “C” site was operated by neighboring offices (Evidence No. 9 of the evidence record), (ii) the accomplice introduced D himself/herself from the police station to the defendant, and started the work, (Evidence No. 1673, 1713 of the evidence record) the defendant stated as the president (Evidence No. 128 of the record), (iii) the accomplice started the operation of the site on condition that he/she and the defendant shared profits (Evidence No. 128 of the record), and the Defendant and E stated that the office was in charge of managing the Chinese office (Evidence No. 123 of the record), and (iv) the defendant stated that the police office was in charge of managing its own profits within 15% of the record No. 5 of the Chinese police (Evidence No. 165 of the record). 4 of the record.