beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s notary public against the Plaintiff is on the authentic deed of promissory notes No. 18, 201, No. 18, No. 2011.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. On January 5, 201, the Defendant: (a) prepared a loan certificate in the name of the Plaintiff as of February 4, 201, stating the loan certificate in the name of the Plaintiff as of February 4, 201; and (b) forged the loan certificate in the name of the Plaintiff (hereinafter “the loan certificate in this case”); (c) affixed the Plaintiff’s seal impression on the Plaintiff’s name and affixed the Plaintiff’s seal impression on his own; and (d) forged the loan certificate in this case.
B. On January 24, 2011, the Defendant: (a) had C enter “Plaintiffs”, “Plaintiffs”, “day-to-day payment”, “Defendants”, “Plaintiffs”, and “Plaintiffs” in the name column of the mandators on the proxy form for law enforcement; (b) had C affix the Plaintiff’s seal attached to the Plaintiff’s name, and forged the Defendant’s name, address, face value, etc. on the proxy form for law enforcement (hereinafter “instant proxy form”) stating the Defendant’s name, address, face value, etc. on the proxy form.
C. The defendant Na
On January 24, 2011 after a notary public arbitrarily prepares a promissory note, the same as the statement in the subsection, and then on January 24, 2011, entrusted a legal administrator with the preparation of the said promissory note as an agent of the plaintiff and the addressee, so if the plaintiff delays the payment of the amount of the promissory note, "a notarized notarial deed (hereinafter referred to as an "notarial deed") to the effect that
D) Based on the instant notarial deed, the Defendant filed an application for a seizure and collection order against the Plaintiff’s claim for the withdrawal of deposit money against the Republic of Korea as the District Court Decision 2011TT2606, and the said court rendered a decision to accept the claim on February 10, 201. E. The instant notarial deed was prepared as follows: (a) the distribution procedure for the distribution of the deposit money (from the District Court D to the Government District Court D to receive KRW 15,471,402 from the Defendant on March 10, 201; and (b) the Defendant received the said dividend on March 14, 201.
F. As above, the Defendant forged the instant loan certificate and the power of attorney.