1. The revocation of the designation of a long-term care institution for older persons that the Defendant rendered to the Plaintiff on August 12, 2014 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

The Plaintiff is operating a long-term care institution that provides facility benefits under the Welfare of Older Persons Act and the Long-Term Care Insurance Act for Older Persons (hereinafter “the instant medical care institution”) with the trade name of “C” in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

From February 25, 2014 to February 28, 2014, the Defendant and the National Health Insurance Corporation conducted an on-site investigation of the instant health care institution (the period subject to the investigation: from August 1, 2013 to January 31, 2014; hereinafter “ instant on-site investigation”) with respect to the instant health care institution.

Based on the results of the instant on-site investigation, on August 12, 2014, the Defendant issued a disposition revoking the designation of the instant medical care institution as of September 30, 2014 pursuant to attached Table 2 pursuant to Article 37(1)4 of the former Act on Long-Term Care Insurance (Amended by Act No. 12067, Aug. 13, 2013; hereinafter the same shall apply) and Article 29 of the former Enforcement Rule of the Long-Term Care Insurance Act (Amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health and Welfare No. 232, Feb. 14, 2014; hereinafter the same shall apply) on the following grounds (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). 【Grounds for Disposition】

1. Request for violation of the criteria for the placement of human resources 15,481,340 won;

A. D, a caregiver, is in exclusive charge of the duties of cooks from August 29, 2013 (hereinafter “reasons for Disposition 1”).

(b) Failure to report 11 beneficiaries, such as E, to the current number of beneficiaries (hereinafter referred to as “reasons for Disposition 2”);

(c) A report on an increase in the working hours of the caregiverF or G;

2. The plaintiff asserts that the disposition of this case in this case is unlawful and revoked on the following grounds that the plaintiff's assertion as to the legitimacy of the disposition of this case as to whether the disposition of this case in this case is legitimate, even though the actual working hours of the assistant nurse H of 1,509,780 won are less than 160 hours per month, and there is no dispute about additional placement of nursing personnel (applicable to recognition).

As to the ground for disposition No. 1, the absence of disposition.