logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2016.07.07 2016고단1125
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 19, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unnecessary Measures after Accidents) (hereinafter “Road Traffic Act”). Around 21:20 on April 19, 2016, the Defendant was driving a B rocketing car at around 2:11-0 long-term crosssection 2:3-lane 11-0 long-term crosssections at Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and stopped without having to determine the course on the quarterly road from Seoul to strengthen the two-lanes. At that time, the Defendant was at the time a C driver, who was under way at the back of the Defendant’s vehicle, and the EK9 passenger vehicle at D, was stopped at the lower end of the said rocketing passenger vehicle. In such a case, the Defendant had a duty of care to prevent the occurrence of an accident by taking care of the vehicle and taking care of it well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while neglecting to stop the next week, left the said rocketing car as it is, and received the front gate of the said K9 car from the right side of the said K9 car, and escaped without immediately stopping the said car to the extent of KRW 1,282,638, the repair cost of the said K9 car, and without taking necessary measures.

2. The special injury Defendant escaped as above at the time of the date set forth in paragraph 1, and when the victim C, who was tracking the said K9 car, was forced to escape by D, and the victim D and the accident resolution that was made by setting up the said rocketing car, the victim C took photographs of the said rocketing car and reported it to the police, and the victim “I will not go against the long-term movement.”

“A person who drives the said rocketing vehicle” and tried to flee again.

In order to stop the Defendant’s re-government as above, the Defendant was aware that the victim C was able to knickly drive the said rocketing car and that the victim D was knicking on the front day of the string of the Defendant’s vehicle. However, the Defendant was running the said rocketing car as it is.

arrow