logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2018.08.07 2018고정52
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

The sentence against the accused shall be determined by a fine of one million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who drives an Dai Ace II-registered non-registered two-wheeled vehicle.

1. On October 16, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving on the part of the Defendant: (a) drive approximately 2 km from the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the front of the

2. Although the Defendant was prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation for Damages, the Defendant driving the above 2 km km from before the time to the front day of the front day of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si of the Si

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The register of motor vehicle terminals;

1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes photographed cars;

1. Relevant Article of the Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, subparagraph 2 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act and Article 43 of the same Act (unlicensed Driving), Article 46 (2) 2, the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the following factors: (a) the fact that a defendant drivess Oralone; (b) the defendant has been punished for a crime similar to several times; and (c) the fact that the defendant has committed another crime even though he/she was punished for a

arrow