The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although the court below acquitted the Defendants of this part of the facts charged, based on erroneous facts, misunderstanding of legal principles, victim's statement, part of the Defendants' statement, CCTV image, etc., the court below found the Defendants not guilty of this part of the facts charged. The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles

B. The lower court’s sentence on Defendant B of unreasonable sentencing (fine of KRW 500,000) is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Judgment on misconception of facts and misapprehension of legal principles

A. The summary of this part of the facts charged at around 17:30 on August 30, 2018, the Defendants stated that “on the front side of the F-ro located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, the victim G, who took place as if he would have been able to get off the loan prior to 20 years and confirmed when he would repay it at any time” and stated that “the victim would be able to talk with each other on the loan borrowed and its repayment schedule to be repaid by the victim and the repayment schedule to be repaid by the victim, and the victim would have “I would like to see the amount of the debt as I would like with the wife because it is difficult to talk.” Defendant B and Defendant D, along with the victim, was driving the said H-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-

At that time, the Defendants asked the victim who was aware of the victim's operation to a place other than the area of the Nam-gu, Nam-gu, Gwangju, without putting the victim in the above-mentioned A-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Won, and the Defendant asked the victim "I-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Won" to "Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Won" and "Wur-Wur-Wur-Wur-Won