logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.07.15 2014고단1192
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(알선수재)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has supplied meals and food materials to each level school, library, etc. under the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education from 1991 to 2011.

1. On December 2008, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (retailing) received a request from the Namsan Library cafeteria located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education to employ his/her son’s son’s son’s son as a public educational official within the jurisdiction of the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education from the Seocho-gu, Yongsan-gu, Seoul. The Defendant said that “E superintendent is well aware of high school 1 year’s son, it is impossible to disregard son’s son’s son’s son, and son’s son’s son’s son

On December 10, 2008, the Defendant received money and valuables from C to arrange matters belonging to public officials' duties under the pretext of arranging D to be employed as public officials of Seoul Office of Education.

2. Around December 2008, the Defendant solicited G, the head of the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education, who is the Flux of the Flux of the Flux of the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education, to employ C’s daughters as the school accounting staff within the jurisdiction of the Seoul Metropolitan Office of Education.

G in response to the defendant's solicitation was arranged to I, who is the chief executive officer of the H High School, and D was employed as an employee of the accounting officer of the H High School on January 19, 2009.

Therefore, the defendant provided a bribe of KRW 1.5 million to G in the F of Seoul Office of Education in the middle of January 2009 by providing G with KRW 1.5 million in the name of the allowance for employment of accounting staff of D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by the prosecution against the defendant orJ;

1. Statement of each police statement related to C and D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a copy of a bankbook, details of account transactions, and details of deposit and withdrawal of agricultural accounts of A;

1. Article 3 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and Articles 133 (1) and 132 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 and Article 38 of the Criminal Code to increase concurrent crimes.

arrow