A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is in the relationship with D, who is his spouse, the victim C (Isle, 35 years of age).

During the thought, while driving a car of the E Lastren, it was difficult to find and drive the FIS test, which is a vehicle of the victim.

On May 9, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 17:46, at the Ganju-gun of North Korea on May 17:46, 2018, she received 6 times the part of the victim’s vehicle in front of the said rental car in front of the said rental car; (b) while driving in the future to avoid this, she would drive the victim’s vehicle in front of the victim’s vehicle; and (c) she stopped her vehicle in front of the victim’s vehicle; and (d) 3 her flick of the drinking size in front of the vehicle left from the vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant, using a dangerous motor vehicle and a stone, inflicted an injury on the victim, such as salt, tensions, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and at the same time damaged the Defendant to use the said a half-time test to exchange the tension with the 2,071,628 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Application of written diagnosis, written estimate, and photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 258-2 (1), 257 (1) (a point of special injury) and 369 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (the punishment imposed on a special injury heavier than that of the punishment);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act ( considered favorable circumstances among the following reasons for sentencing) is not specified in the method of dealing with ordinary concurrent crimes, and thus, it is not separately examined.

In this case, the defendant has a bad faith relationship with the husband of the defendant.

In light of the suspected fact that part of the vehicle on which the victim was aboard and damaged the vehicle of the victim, and at the same time, the victim inflicted an injury on the victim at the same time, and the act itself or the fear of the victim at the time is made.