logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.11.06 2013고단1995
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 20, 2013, at around 22:50, the Defendant refused a request for a alcohol test by a police officer without any justifiable reason, even though he was required to comply with a alcohol test by inserting the breath in a breath of alcohol, on the ground that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that he was driven under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking, smelling, snicking, snicking, snicking, etc. from an slope D belonging to the traffic guidance department of Kim Jong-gu Police Station, while driving Cmast car on the front-distance road in the Kim Jong-si, Kim Jong-si, which is located in the direction of traffic guidance of the Kim Jong-si, while driving

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The application of any photograph refusing to measure alcohol, evidence photographing statute;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (i.e., the fact that there is no criminal record heavier than the fine, the confession of the crime in this case, and the fact that the social relationship is obvious);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution ( repeatedly considering the reason for discretionary mitigation);

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

arrow