(a) The time when the authority has become final and conclusive on the property devolvingd;

B. The nature of the administrative disposition taken in order to correct the result of the non-satisfing in accordance with the terms of the agreement of the disputing party with respect to the right to the right to the property devolving upon the limitation of the right

(c)where the contents of the Convention on the Limits of SDRs have been reported to the authorities concerned and restrictions on administrative action between the parties concerned with respect to SDRs;

(a) As long as the property originally reverted is dealt with by the principle of priority of the relative, the competent authorities in charge of the affairs related to the property cannot escape from the right to annual interest as prescribed in this Article, and if one of the authorities in charge of the affairs related to the property leases or leaves the property belonging to the relative, it is not necessarily required to determine the scope of the original property (the limitation of the right to annual interest) but can be confirmed after the contract.

(b) If the content of the Convention on the Limits of the tobacco rights established between the disputing parties with respect to the right of tobacco has been reported to the administrative authority, the administrative authority shall deal with it in accordance with the terms of that Convention with respect to the annual property.

Article 15 of the Act on Asset Disposal for Reversion

Maximum Pap

The Director General of the Seoul Metropolitan Government

Seoul High Court Decision 59Da52 delivered on December 30, 1959

The court below's determination that the plaintiff's disposal of the property was 10 years old and 4 years old and that the defendant's disposal of the property was 10 years old and was 10 years old and 4 years old and was 10 years old and 4 years old and 5 years old and 4 years old and 9 years old and 17 years old and 4 years old and 4 years old and 4 years old and 57777. The court below's determination that the plaintiff's disposal of the property was 1 year old and 4 years old and 9 years old and 17 years old and 9 years old and 17 years old were 17 years old and 4 years old and 57 days old and 577 days old and 197.

Justices Oh Ki-soo (Presiding Judge)