1. It is confirmed that each insurance contract entered in the separate sheet concluded between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is invalid.

2. The defendant.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 25, 2010, the Plaintiff and the Defendant’s spouse B concluded an insurance contract as indicated in the attached list No. 1 with the Defendant as the insured on February 25, 2010, and thereafter changed the contractor to the Defendant.

On July 21, 2010, the Plaintiff and the Defendant concluded an insurance contract listed in attached Table No. 2 with the Defendant as the insured on July 21, 2010, and concluded an insurance contract listed in attached Table No. 2 with the renewal on July 21, 2013, as stated in attached Table No. 3 (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant insurance contracts”).

B. On April 5, 2010, the Defendant paid the Plaintiff’s insurance proceeds and the Plaintiff’s insurance proceeds, as indicated in the separate hospitalization, was hospitalized for 15 days at the Council members for 15 days, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones, and as indicated in the separate hospitalization, received hospitalization for 151 days in total from April 5, 2010 to May 13, 2014 at each hospital, and received KRW 10,370,000 in total from the Plaintiff according to each insurance contract of this case.

C. The status of the conclusion of each insurance contract by the defendant, etc., and each insurance contract concluded by the defendant, B, and D, who are children of the defendant, as the insured, were concluded in 2010 with similar coverage contents and nature. The insurance proceeds received by the defendant, B, and D from the insurance companies, including the plaintiff, due to the insured events as seen earlier according to each of the above insurance contracts are as stated in the attached insurance coverage and the payment details of the insurance proceeds.

The revenue amount and income amount reported by the defendant, including the property and income amount of the defendant, to the tax office from 2005 to 2010 are as follows, and the defendant paid automobile tax and property tax on the housing from 2005 to 2007, but it was not subject to property tax from 2008 to 2010.

The income amount of income of the year 205 business income, 95,415, 363 4,872, 922, 206 business income of 23,015, 220, 6, 707, 761 207 business income of 5,710, 500 business income of 1,027,000 business income of 1,404,000 business income of 208 business income of 1,404,000.