logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.08.17 2017고정43
명예훼손
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 7, 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the written indictment to “F (75 years, n, F) of the victim F (hereinafter “F)” to the victim F (hereinafter “F) outside of the D female bath located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu, the Defendant: (b) “F (F) went away several times in order to prevent him/her from managing a political party’s bath; (c) the Defendant entered the Gwangju City viewing and D office every day to prevent the F from taking care of the political party’s body; and (d) the Defendant was a bad woman who is a bad woman who is unable to remove his/her mother from the E body, and who is a partner of the E body.

However, according to the witness E and F’s statement, it is only recognized that the Defendant stated the same facts as the facts constituting the crime, and as determined in the acquittal part below, it is not recognized that the Defendant stated that “F is a woman with poor conditions in finding and working in Gwangju viewing or participating in them,” and thus, it is corrected ex officio to the extent that it does not interfere with the Defendant’s defense right.

The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of the witness E and F [the statement of witness E is the defendant's act, the statement of the situation before and after the crime is consistent and concrete, and the statement is false even when taking charge of punishment for perjury in light of the attitude of the statement in this court;

Since it is difficult to see credibility, credibility is recognized.

Meanwhile, in this court’s statement that “E was made within the bath at the time of the instant case, and confirmed whether there was such fact by the victim on the day when the Defendant took the words such as the facts charged.” The investigative agency asked the victim on the day when the Defendant took the words such as the facts charged, and the victim and the Defendant made a statement to the victim on the same day as the facts charged.”

arrow