Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 5, 2015, the Defendant received a demand to present an identification card from E, who belongs to the police station D police station of the Gyeonggi-do, after receiving a report on the fact that there was an alcoholic value test at the “C” entertainment station located on the first underground level B at the time of the government around 02:10, the Defendant received a demand to present an identification card from E, which was called out.

Defendant E did not investigate from the business owner of the above “C” and, on the ground that he demanded to present an identification card first to himself and the chemicalization took place, Defendant “Ye, patp police, Chewing gue,” identified our identification card, fat, fatd, fatd, fatd, and fatd, and fatd.

Doctrine Doctrine;

In order to avoid interference with the performance of official duties, he/she considers that he/she “(s)” is “(s)”, and he/she takes part of his/her wall.

In other words, they were faced with the shoulder of the above E, and assaulted at one time on the left side of the above E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting handling duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. G statements;

1. Receipts:

1. Application of statutes on business registration certificates;

1. Article 136 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the fact that it appears to be a ground contingent crime in sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the fact that it appears to be a ground contingent crime in sentencing, the fact that it has no previous record of a fine once, the fact that it is in depth, the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, and the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined by taking into consideration the sentencing conditions