The defendant shall be exempted from punishment.

Punishment of the crime

On August 14, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny, etc. in Seoul Southern District Court on August 22, 2013 and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 22, 2013.

around 11:50 on September 20, 2012, the Defendant entered the “C” singing stores located in the Dong-gu Busan Metropolitan City.

Although the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the drinking value, he did not pay the said value to the victim D, the owner of the business, who did not have the intent or ability to pay the drinking value, and did not receive the service equivalent to KRW 2,50,000,00 in total, including KRW 130,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. A criminal investigation report (general);

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records, results of case search, and application of a copy of judgment;

1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Handling concurrent crimes and exemption of punishment: The latter part of Articles 37 and 39 (1) of the Criminal Act ( Taking into account the equity in cases where judgment is to be rendered concurrently with the crime for which judgment has become final and conclusive);