All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment in light of the evidence duly admitted, the lower court’s judgment that found the Defendant guilty of damage to special public goods among the facts charged in the instant case on the grounds stated in its reasoning is justifiable, and there is no error of law by misapprehending the legal doctrine regarding the relation with the person as alleged in the grounds of

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to the prosecutor’s grounds for appeal in light of the records, the lower court partially inappropriate part of the judgment, but the conclusion of the lower court that reversed the first instance judgment and acquitted the Defendant on charges of interference with general traffic among the facts charged in the instant case is justifiable. In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.