All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the judgment of the court below in light of the records, it is justifiable to reverse the judgment of the court of first instance that found Defendant A guilty of the facts charged in this case on the grounds that there is no proof of crime, and to find Defendant A not guilty.

In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on common traffic obstruction or joint principals.

2. Examining the reasoning of Defendant E’s appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court was justifiable to have found Defendant E guilty of the facts charged in this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning.

In so doing, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles on common traffic obstruction or joint principals.

3. All appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.