1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 14, 2010, the Plaintiff is an employee who became a counselor belonging to the ABR team and worked as a counselor belonging to the ABR team (IBR).

B. On July 6, 2012, from around 18:20 to 21:15 of the same day, the Plaintiff, along with 30 employees, including the head of E, who is the person in charge of AB-E in the restaurant in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, as well as the head of E, who is the person in charge of AB-E team (hereinafter “the first type type”).

On July 6, 2012, 2012, after the completion of the first ceremony, the Plaintiff, along with 12 employees, including the head of E, moved to a G K K K K KK room located in the Yongsan-gu F and fourth floor building in Yongsan-gu in Seoul. Since long time has passed since he moved to the said K K KK room, the Plaintiff was suffering from the instant accident where the Plaintiff was caused by the injury of the “alley, tent, tent, etc.” due to misconception of the emergency exit as a toilet, opened the door as a toilet, and opened the toilet as a toilet, and fell to the bottom below the emergency exit.

On July 19, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application with the Defendant for medical care benefits for the injury and disease.

C. On August 10, 2012, the Defendant prepared for some employees to allow them to enjoy entertainment. As such, the instant accident constitutes a disaster that occurred in the course of private activities beyond the control and management of the employer, and accordingly, issued the instant disposition that did not have proximate causal relation with the business and did not approve medical care benefits.

[Reasons for Recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, each entry of Gap evidence 1 to 7 (including each number), the whole purport of the pleading

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The head of E, who is the person in charge of the Abalian Team, led by the plaintiff's assertion of the non-party company, started the second ceremony of this case immediately after the completion of the first ceremony of this case by a majority of the participants participating in the first ceremony, and the expenses incurred in the second ceremony of this case were appropriated by the prize paid to Abalian Team. Thus, the second ceremony of this case is the business owner.