Defendants are not guilty.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a business operator engaged in the manufacturing industry with the trade name of “F” in e in ethic City. Defendant B and C are those who worked for the victim H Co., Ltd. in Haju-si, and “F” have been supplied with parts from the victim.

The Defendants conspired to steal the parts owned by the victim as the victim requested the increase of the unit price and refused the delivery of the parts of the vehicle, and then conspired to steal the parts owned by the victim. At around 08:00 on August 10, 2012, the Defendants entered the factory using the entrance door which was reproduced at the victim’s factory to enter the factory, and KRW 3,856,00 on the market price of COMV 9,640 on the 3,856,640 on the 3-300 COMB COV 3,564 market price, KRW 1,603,60 on the 300 COMB COV 3,564 market price, KRW 300 on the 1,603,60, 604, 804, 800, 300, 605, 305, 60, 605, 205, 305, 205, 205, 2, 30

Ultimately, the Defendants jointly stolen the victim’s property.

2. The judgment of this Court

A. The content of the contract between Defendant A and H (hereinafter “H”) on the Defendants’ assertion that the above Defendant provided materials owned by the said Defendant to H was processed by H and supplied the materials to the said Defendant. As such, the part brought by the Defendants was owned by Defendant A from the original point of view, and the Defendants brought about is not subject to larceny.

B. According to the records, Defendant A and H entered into a discretionary processing contract with the content that the above Defendant supplied raw materials owned by them to form a finished product as a finished product by processing them by H, and each part of the facts charged in the instant case is also subject to such a discretionary processing contract.