logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 원주지원 2017.04.13 2017고단73
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 18, 2016, the Defendant and B drinking alcohol at “D main points” located in 199:00, around 07:00, when the Defendant drinking alcohol to the “D main points” and drinking alcohol to the victim E (21:3). The Defendant, while taking the victim’s desire, went beyond the floor by cutting head bonds, embling the head bonds into the floor, embling the face on two occasions by drinking and drinking, and embling the body by hand and b. B reached several times due to drinking and drinking.

2. The defendant who interfered with the performance of official duties on the same day was reported at the above place 07:40 on the same day and was dispatched at the above place 112, and was a public official belonging to the police station of the original police station, for the purpose of investigating the circumstances of the G in this case, who is a public official belonging to the police station of the F District of the original police station,

I expressed the desire of this dog H Ha ", etc., and pushed the breath of the police officer's breath with his hand, and interfered with the prevention and investigation of the police officer's crime, and the handling of the 112 reported case.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol of suspect interrogation of the police against B or E;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of damaged photographs and victim E-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 2(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. for Criminal Offense, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, and each of the fines (the crime committed during the period of probation should be strictly punished. However, joint assault was committed by both assaults, the victim was paid an agreed amount, and the victim agreed that the degree of assault for obstructing the performance of official duties is not severe. In light of the above, it appears that it would be somewhat harsh to invalidate the existing suspended sentence by sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for the defendant, and thus, it would be a fine)

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

arrow