The punishment of the accused shall be determined by six months of imprisonment.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 28, 2016, at the Gwangju Mine Police Station Women and B Team workers office located in 551 as Gwangju Mine, etc. around 21:56, on the ground that the police officers did not inform the defendant and the person related to de facto marriage of detailed contents about the case in which the defendant reported the defendant, the defendant tried to investigate the suspect at the above police station assistantD belonging to the above police station, such as "I am, open, swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe swe s we swe s we swe s we ss we s we s we s we s we swe s we s we s we s we s we s we s we s we s we s we s we s we s we s we s we s we s.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties regarding the suppression of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to E and D;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of the recommended punishment on the sentencing criteria [the types of decisions] the basic area [the scope of the recommended punishment] 6 months from 6 months to 1 year and 4 months, respectively; and

2. Determination of sentence: Imprisonment with prison labor for six months (two years of suspended sentence), and all the sentencing conditions specified in the pleadings of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, environment, circumstances, and circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered, taking into consideration the following circumstances.

Unfavorable circumstances: The cases of assaulting a police officer who is performing his/her duties properly, such as taking a bath, taking a bath, etc., and obstructing the performance of his/her duties.

A favorable condition: The defendant has no record of criminal punishment, except for a punishment of a fine by driving alcohol on 200.

It was true that there was a misunderstanding, and that it was not reoffending.