logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.05.10 2016가합30081
정정보도등
Text

1. Defendant YTN “C” and D, which broadcast within 10 days after the judgment of this case became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff, as E, served as the president of the National Armed Forces Welfare Group from August 27, 2014 to August 26, 2016.

Defendant Loen Entertainment Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is a broadcasting company operating the YTN of the comprehensive news channel, and Defendant B is a social reporter of the Defendant Company.

According to the news coverage of Defendant B’s news report by the Defendants, the Defendant Company reported the following [Attachment] via G and the Internet:

(C) The Plaintiff was not guilty of an indecent act committed by the victim and his/her employee on the ground that he/she committed an indecent act by the victim on the ground that he/she committed an indecent act by the victim on the ground that he/she committed an indecent act by the victim on the ground that he/she committed an indecent act by the victim on the ground that he/she committed an indecent act by the victim on the ground that he/she was not guilty of the indecent act by the victim on the ground that he/she committed an indecent act by the victim on the ground that he/she committed an indecent act by the victim on the ground that he/she committed an indecent act by the victim on the ground that he/she committed an indecent act by the victim on the ground that he/she committed an indecent act by the victim on the ground that he/she committed an indecent act by the victim on the ground that he/she did not intend to commit an indecent act by the victim on the ground that he/she did not intend to commit an indecent act by the victim on the ground that he/she committed an indecent act by the victim on the ground that he/she was not guilty.

[The District Court 2015 High Court 2015 Highest 4715, 5511(combined)] This is currently pending in the appellate court by filing an appeal by a prosecutor.

(Ground of recognition) 2017No72. [Ground of recognition] does not dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 7, 9, 11 through 13, Eul evidence 1, 2.

arrow