beta
Text
1. The part of the Plaintiff’s claim for the confirmation of each right of retention among the lawsuits against the Plaintiff’s Seoul General Construction, B, and C, and Defendant.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On March 9, 2011, Defendant B entered into a contract for the construction of a new loan on the ground of Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, and on the same day, Defendant C also entered into a contract for the construction of a new loan on the ground of H with the amount of KRW 500 million for Defendant C-do comprehensive construction of New loan on the ground of Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Inc. by setting the price as KRW 50 million.
B. From June 201, the Plaintiff received a subcontract for construction of a 364,013,600,000 won in total from the construction of the Defendant Qudong Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “instant building”) to October 10 of the same year, including a subcontract for construction of a 3.64,01,013,60 million won in total. The Plaintiff completed the construction of 101, 102 Dong Dong Dong (hereinafter “instant building”).
C. Around November 201, Defendant Qu General Construction, B, and C agreed to pay to the Plaintiff the price for the portion that the Plaintiff performed on the instant building subcontracted to the Plaintiff, and KRW 32,013,600 of the said construction price was not yet paid.
Attached Form
An occupant of the same number of owners of the 6101 Dong 401 Dong, Defendant accompanied by the Defendant accompanied by the Defendant, Inc., Ltd., 8102 Dong 102 Dong 101, 102 Dong 102 Dong 102 Dong 102 Dong 101 J 201, J 102 Dong 202 Dong 102 Dong 102 Dong 102 Dong 302, Defendant E- 13 102 Dong 102 Dong 401, Defendant F 141 Dong 402 Dong 402 KK
D. The present ownership and possession of each sectionally owned building among the instant buildings are as follows:
[Based on the recognition] Construction of Saturdays, B, and C: The remaining Defendants of each confession: The absence of dispute, each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the witness L's testimony, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. We examine ex officio the part concerning the claim for confirmation of lien among the instant lawsuit ex officio.
The plaintiff has a large effect on the lien, and the building of this case, which is a sectionally owned building, Nos. 6,8.