logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.01.15 2015고단2574
배임
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the reconstruction association of E-Ba, which is a multi-household located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D (the reconstruction was the content that the existing 18 households reconstructed as 20 households).

is the person who was the representative of the Commission.

Defendant around October 21, 2012, F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) around around October 21, 2012

And the construction cost of KRW 1.26 billion shall be paid, and 2 newly constructed loan units (No. 101, 602 and 102, 602, and 101, 101, 201, 102, 102, and 201, 101, 102, and 102, 101, 201, at the request of H, an owner of 101, 201).

transfer of ownership.

“In the content, the construction contract for the reconstruction work of the above loan was entered into, and around September 22, 2013, F Co., Ltd. was no longer capable of performing the said reconstruction work, the victim I Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd.”).

The subcontract agreement for the construction project to be in charge of the reconstruction project was concluded with the same content as the contract agreement.

After that, the Defendant changed the name of the building to K apartment after completion of the reconstruction construction for the above Ba, and the occupants move in by the occupants, and the above apartment units subject to general sale pursuant to the above reconstruction construction contract and construction subcontract contract (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”).

The duty to implement the registration procedure for ownership transfer to the victim company that performed reconstruction work has occurred.

Nevertheless, on September 24, 2014, the defendant violated the above duties, and registered the preservation of ownership in the name of the defendant with respect to the apartment of this case at the registry office of the Seoul Northern District Court in Seoul Northern District Court on September 24, 2014, and thereafter the right to request the transfer of ownership to the right holder on the same day (hereinafter referred to as "provisional registration of this case").

By making a completion, the above L has the above L take the benefit of KRW 200 million at the apartment market price of this case, and the injured company shall be damaged by the same amount.

arrow