logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.08.21 2014가합22500
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the store listed in the attached list No. 2.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On June 24, 2013, the Plaintiff purchased a building with the exception of the part of 63.55 square meters underground among the buildings listed in the attached list No. 1 of Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seoul, and the above land owned by Dong Petroleum (hereinafter “instant building,” and the building and the above land collectively referred to as “each of the instant real estate”). The Plaintiff purchased a building with the exception of the part of 63.55 square meters underground among the buildings listed in the attached list No. 1 of the above land, which are owned by Dong Petroleum, and the remainder of the building (hereinafter “instant building”). The Plaintiff concluded a sales contract with the Dong Petroleum with the payment of KRW 66,852,763 won as the public charges attached to each of the instant real estate from the Dong Petroleum, and the amount of KRW 363,793,65 won as the wage liability attached to the promotion company and Seongbuk-gu, and the total amount of KRW 608,400,600 and KRW 468,2008.

B. On March 31, 2012, Dong Petroleum entered into a lease on a deposit basis with C, one of the co-representative directors of the Plaintiff and 262.04 square meters among the five floors of the instant building, and entered into a lease on a deposit basis with D, one of the other co-representative directors of the Plaintiff, and 69.02 square meters among the first floor of the instant building, and received payment of KRW 600,000,000 in total as KRW 300,000,000 from C and D, respectively.

On June 24, 2013, the Plaintiff agreed to offset the amount of KRW 600,000,000 under the instant sales contract, which was paid by the Plaintiff on the same day, against C and D’s above amount of KRW 600,00,000 against the claim for return of security deposit money.

C. On the other hand, on May 30, 2012, the Defendant concluded a lease agreement with a store listed in the attached Table 2 (hereinafter “instant store”) among the instant building, setting the lease term from June 1, 2012 to December 31, 2013 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

arrow