logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.05.20 2014가단20256
추심금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff was sentenced to the Ulsan District Court Decision 2013Kahap8751 on the Gwangju Day Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Mail Day”) that the Plaintiff would pay the Plaintiff KRW 100,000,000 and damages for delay from March 26, 2013.

The judgment of this case is hereinafter referred to as "the judgment of this case".

The defendant received KRW 600,000,000 from the mining date, and deposited KRW 600,000,000 as security according to the decision of this case by the Busan District Court's 201Kadan2358 Provisional Disposition, which received KRW 600,000 from the above court as well as the cancellation of security on February 25, 2013.

B. The Cheong Forest Industry Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Cheong Forest Industry”).

The Ulsan District Court 2013TTTT 3017 held that the deposit amount of KRW 600,000,000 is "the deposit of this case" and the deposit amount of KRW 600,000 is "the bond of this case".

Among the 122,416,438 won, the court requested a seizure and collection order, and the court issued a seizure and collection order on March 12, 2013.

the defendant was served on March 14, 2013.

C. The Plaintiff filed an order for provisional attachment of KRW 289,143,310 out of the instant claims with the Ulsan District Court 2013Kahap236, and applied for provisional attachment order against the said court on April 5, 2013.

B Upon receipt of the judgment of this case, the Defendant was served on April 11, 2013, and thereafter, according to the judgment of this case, the Ulsan District Court 2014TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTE 2016 applied for a seizure and collection order, and the above court applied for a seizure and collection order, which transferred the provisional seizure from the above court to the provisional seizure in relation to KRW 100,00,000 on June 3, 2014.

(A) received [No dispute over the basis for recognition, as described in the evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, and 5, and evidence No. 7-1, 2, and 8-1, 2, and 2]

2. Determination.

arrow