logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.09.14 2015고정1383
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2006, the Defendant introduced D with regard to the purchase of land in Gangwon-do to the victim C, a workplace partner, and D suggested that D may impose money when investing in the purchase of land in Gangwon-do to the above victim, and received remittance of KRW 720 million from the above victim under the pretext of investment, but did not repay the investment money.

Accordingly, the victim filed a complaint against D as a crime of fraud, and D was prosecuted on March 26, 2013 by Suwon District Court 2013Gohap178 and continued to be tried.

On June 25, 2013, the Defendant appeared in the court of Suwon District Court located in Suwon District Court 80, Suwon District Court, which held the witness of the case of violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) against the above D, such as Suwon District Court 2013Gohap178.

1. Although the Defendant, D, and the victim have invested KRW 700 million in purchasing land E in Gangwon-do, they agreed to divide ownership by 1/3 in purchasing land of Gangwon-do Crossing-gun or paid KRW 250 million, despite the fact that they did not have invested KRW 700 million in purchasing land of Gangwon-do Crossing-gun, the Defendant was willing to make a false statement with the intent of favorableizing D in the above judgment.

The Defendant testified from D’s defense counsel that “A witness, C, and D shall not have any fact to purchase the land of the Gangwon-do Crossing-gun in return for 1/3 each time at around 2006,” and testified that “F shall have invested 250 million won each by 1/3,000,000,000 won,” and that “I shall have remitted all the amount equivalent to 300 million won and 250 million won or more from the Defendant’s loan of the witness” to the question of “The acquisition amount shall be for 1/3,000,000,000 won.”

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. In fact D does not have any entry of 300 million won in the purchase of the F land of the Crossing-gun.

arrow