Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

, however, from the date when this judgment has become final.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A around 02:10 on March 14, 2014, around 02:0, around 02:10, the victim F (the son and 33 years of age) who is an employee of the above telecomer in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D came to go from the front of the above telecomer on the ground that the victim F (the son and 33 years of age) was going to go to the front of the above telecomer, and the victim's face was flick at once, and the victim's head was flick at once, and the defendant B was flick up about 10 times by drinking, and flick up the victim's face was flick at three times by drinking, and flick up one time by drinking.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victim, such as the inside and the mouth of the 8 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the Defendants and F

1. The police officer and the prosecutor's office's statement concerning G;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. A medical certificate of injury, and a written opinion;

1. Application of CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 2 (2) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 2 (1) of the same Act concerning the selection of a punishment, and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended execution;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the community service order [Determination of the type] of general injury [Determination of the recommended area]: April to June 1: There is no record of criminal punishment [No record of the suspended sentence]. The main reason for sentencing is that Defendant A provided the loan of this case and did not act such as speaking at the time when Defendant B and the victim wraped. However, Defendant A's act was merely a victim's back head spatha and fat, and Defendant B took part in the crime of this case. Defendant B took part in the trial expenses between Defendant A and the victim, and suffered bodily injury, such as inside part and spathal part and spathal part of the face and spathal part of the face and spathal part of the face, and the spathal order of the face spathal part of the face. The Defendants suffered bodily injury.