1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months.

2. Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,00,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is the representative director of EAF established by farmers belonging to the Navy for the purpose of growing investigation fees, and the defendant C is the representative director of FFF farming association established for the above purpose, and the defendant B is the self-employed who sells agricultural machinery in the trade name of G.

1. Defendant A and Defendant B filed an application for a subsidy with the representative director of the said legal entity for a subsidy program to support new management body equipment and equipment, on condition that a farmer bears approximately 70% of the purchase price of agricultural machinery in order to establish a stable production foundation for high-quality lighting equipment, etc. on or around March 5, 2012, Defendant A and Defendant B filed an application for a subsidy of KRW 34.5 million on the condition that the victim would bear approximately 129 million of the purchase price of agricultural machinery. On March 5, 2012, Defendant A received a notification of the determination of the subsidy of KRW 34.5 million on the condition that the victim would bear KRW 94.5 million of the project cost for purchasing agricultural machinery.

Defendant

A around May 2012, at the house of Defendant A located in the Jeonnam-gun, Namnam-gun, around May 2012, the fact that Defendant B had no ability to pay the said subsidies for the said subsidies. If Defendant B first remitted the money corresponding to the said subsidies, the Defendant A again remitted the said money to Defendant B, and proposed that he/she would submit the said documents to the victim as if he/she remitted the money corresponding to his/her own contributions to Defendant B, and the Defendant B consented to the payment of the said subsidies by deceiving the victim as if he/she did not pay his/her own contributions even though he/she did not pay his/her own contributions.

On May 15, 2012, Defendant B, as conspired with Defendant A, remitted KRW 94.5 million to Defendant A on May 15, 2012, and Defendant A, after withdrawing the said money and remitting it to Defendant B on the same day, deceiving the victim by submitting the statement of remittance to the victim, and was granted subsidies of KRW 34.5 million from the victim on May 29, 2012.

2.