Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

[2012 Highest 124] On April 5, 2012, the Defendant received a notice of call-up in the name of the second unit commander of the 5312 military unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 5312 military reserve forces in the 16th month, which was a member of the homeland reserve forces, in the C office located in Yong-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Seoul, and the 16th unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 2nd unit of the 5312 military reserve forces training site.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not receive the above training without justifiable grounds.

[2012 Highest 208] The defendant is a local reserve member,

1. On June 4, 2012, the facts charged in the facts charged in the second supplementary training in the Army, which was conducted at the training site of the second unit of the second unit of the Army, which was located in the Dolsan-gun, the Dolsan-gun, the Doluri-gun, the Doluri-gun, on June 15, 2012, stated that the facts charged in the second supplementary training is “the second supplementary training”, but according to the receipt of the notice of the call-up (the eight pages of the evidence record in the case No. 2012 high-class 208), it appears that it is a clerical error in the “second supplementary training in the preceding half-year.”

The notice of convening the training of homeland reserve forces in the name of the above second commander who caused 6 hours shall not be received without good cause, even after being served with the notice of convening the training of homeland reserve forces;

2. On July 13, 2012, at the headquarters of the above reserve forces around July 13, 2012, the facts charged in the charge of the second supplementary training conducted on July 23, 2012 at the training site of the said reserve forces include “the second supplementary training conducted on July 24, 2012” as “the second supplementary training conducted on July 24, 2012.” However, according to the receipt of the notice of call for training (Evidence 43 pages of the evidence of the case No. 2012No. 208), it appears that it is a clerical error in the “fourth supplementary training for the last half of the year carried forward.”

The facts charged in the charge of “the third supplementary training for the 111-year second half-time period”, which is carried out on July 25, 2012, include “the third supplementary training for the 3rd second supplementary training for the 11-year second half-time period,” but the receipt notice of a training call notice No. 2012 largeest 208.