logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.02.19 2013고정1634
건강기능식품에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant

A A Fines 3,00,000 won, Defendant B’s fine 2,000,000 won, and Defendant C’s fine 2,00,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

D is a person who operates a health food selling company under the trade name "F" in 801 of the Won-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City E building 801, and Defendant A is a person who conducts food sales and management business as the director of the division of the F, G, Defendant B, and Defendant C as the team leader of the F.

1. No person who violates the Health Functional Foods Act shall indicate or advertise on the name, raw materials, manufacturing methods, nutrients, ingredients, methods of use, quality, traceability, etc. of health functional foods with a content that is likely to have efficacy or efficacy in preventing and treating diseases, or to mislead or confuse them as medicine, and no business operator of health functional foods shall sell products by promoting speculative spirit, such as selling examples or giving free gifts, etc.;

Nevertheless, from May 5, 2013 to August 9, 2013, the Defendants sold “H”, a health functional food, in collusion with D and G, to an unspecified number of unspecified persons at the said F’s workplace, and sold H products totaling KRW 77,827,00,00, by advertising that “if the Defendants scambling with H, it shall have a substantial effect on the skin disease, such as salt, urine, urine, and so on, and skin exposure.”

In addition, in collusion with D and G, the Defendants sold the above functional health foods to the unspecified number of customers who found the said functional health foods at the above time and place, and offered free gifts, such as car play, fright, presses, cream, cream, altered cream, etc.

2. Any person who intends to sell livestock products in violation of the Livestock Products Sanitary Control Act shall install certain facilities and report thereon to the competent authorities;

Nevertheless, the Defendants, in collusion with D and G, operated the “F” at the same time and place as the above “1” without reporting to the competent authorities, and did so to a large number of unspecified customers who found such places.

arrow