logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.02.10 2013고정3948
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동공갈)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around July 2012, the Defendant came to know of B from the last leave while serving in the military through the Internet “tax clubs” hosting, and found B as the house of the Incheon Dong-gu C Apartment 110 Dong-gu, Incheon and 1601 Dong-gu, Incheon.

On September 5, 2012, at around 10:00, the Defendant listened to the Grand Cellus of B, and found the alcoholic beverage as the house of B, and had sexual intercourse with B under an agreement with B, and the Defendant came to the mother telecom in which the Defendant was living.

Nevertheless, the defendant filed a false complaint as if he was raped by B, and received the agreement by using it.

On September 5, 2012, the Defendant reported 112 on September 5, 2012 to the effect that he was raped, and returned to the Incheon Won tower support center located in the Dong-gu Incheon, Dong-gu, Incheon, on board the police officer's vehicle, but he could not make a statement under the influence of alcohol, and returned to Korea after receiving only sexual assault inspection.

At around 10:30 on September 7, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement of damage upon submitting a complaint to the effect that “The Defendant was raped from B while drinking alcohol at the house of September 5, 2012, and punished B.”

Accordingly, the defendant filed a false complaint with the aim of having B criminal punishment even though he did not have been raped from B, and filed a false complaint with B.

2. Around September 6, 2012, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (joint conflict) stated that he was sexual assaulted only before the previous sexual assault inspection and did not make a statement of damage, and that D reported to the police by rape. D received an agreement from rape and offered a proposal to accept the agreement, and the Defendant respondeded to the agreement, provided that B’s contact address was provided to D, and the Defendant and D conspired to take money and valuables under the pretext of agreement by threatening B by rape.

D On September 6, 2012, parents contact B on September 6, 2012.

arrow