logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.12.11 2018누58150
보상금증액청구의 소
Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The grounds alleged by the Plaintiffs in the first instance court are not different from the allegations in the first instance court, and the first instance court’s judgment, which partially accepted the Plaintiffs’ claim, is justified even if examining the submitted evidence together with the Plaintiffs’ assertion.

Therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the court concerning this case is as follows: (a) the Land Compensation Act (hereinafter “Land Compensation Act”) No. 11, No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as “Enforcement Decree of the Land Compensation Act”; and (b) No. 13, No. 12 shall be deemed as “the judgment of the court of first instance”; and (c) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the court of first instance,

(The part concerning the joint plaintiff D in the first instance court, excluding the part corresponding only to the joint plaintiff D in the first instance court, was separated and finalized since both the above plaintiff and the defendant did not appeal,). 2. If so, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow