1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasons for this Court’s explanation are as follows: (a) the part concerning the cited reasoning from [1. Basic Facts] to [3.0] of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasons, including the attached Form 2 to the attached Table 6, except for addition or re-use as follows; and (b) therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

[Supplementary Parts] The fourth 1st sentence of the first instance judgment is as follows:

In the column of subsection 1 and 2 (based on recognition), the phrase “B 13 and 14” and the fact-finding results of this Court with respect to X head of the Gun respectively.

On the other hand, the Defendant entered into a contract for entrusting the collection and transportation of domestic waste in X-gun (hereinafter “cleaning service contract”) with X-gun, and performed cleaning services through the Plaintiffs. X-gun presented the average labor cost for the entire workers calculated according to the amount of specific allowances out of the cost of the entrusted work cost to the Defendant, and the Defendant shall bear the total cost of the entrusted work cost determined for the entrusted work, such as human resources employment, equipment operation, etc., and the amount of the personnel cost change determined in consultation with X-gun.

In front of the fifth 8th part of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term allowances, good attendance allowances, physical training allowances, and holiday leave allowances do not stipulate a daily settlement in the case of retirement even during the period of continuous service or amount of labor, and thus, are not included in ordinary wages. The Defendant added the following to the third 13th part of the judgment of the court of first instance. Even if the term allowances, etc. fall under ordinary wages, this is a regular bonus, and the Defendant received the labor expenses determined by X-gun in accordance with the cleaning service contract with X-gun and paid all the Plaintiffs. Accordingly, according to the result of wage litigation, the Plaintiffs and the Defendant understood that the said regular bonus does not constitute ordinary wages.