logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.05.25 2016고단4759
폭행
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendants shall serve as public officials at the Seoul Metropolitan City, Southern-gu Office C community service center.

On August 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven the victim D (21) who is a social service personnel; (b) performed the duty of having the victim fly the solar flag on the street, etc.; and (c) around August 14:35, 2016, at the above C community service center office located in Nam-gu Seoul metropolitan area E, the injured party called the Defendant; and (d) made the head of the F Office clear and clear statement of the death.

"Along with the victim's face, the victim was expressed in mind, and assaulted at one time the victim's face."

Summary of Evidence

1. Entry of the defendant in part in the first trial record;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, F and G;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Written statements of D;

1. There is no reasonable ground for rejecting the credibility of a CD recording the face of the assault [the victim’s investigative agency and legal statement are consistent and consistent with the above CD images (the following facts charged by the Defendant and the defense counsel are inconsistent with the above CD images).

On the other hand, the witness F and G do not appear to have been actively and clearly made due to the relationship with the defendant working together, although the victim was directly or could have been aware of the above violence at the present site.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

1. Article 186(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act bearing the Costs of Trial [the defendant and his/her defense counsel] (the defendant and his/her defense counsel did not have physical contact with the victim because he/she did not have any physical contact with the victim while intending to catch a victim by asking out his/her arms in English after taking the victim into custody; and even if the defendant had physical contact with the victim;

This is also a subordinate who takes a desire.

arrow