logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2012.12.20 2012고단2423
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2012 Highest 2423]

1. Fraud Defendant

A. On July 19, 2012, the facts in the “E” restaurant operated by the victim D in Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around 19:50 on July 2, 2012 are provided by ordering the victim to pay 3,000 won as if the victim had no intent or ability to pay the price despite having ordered food.

B. At around 23:00 of the same month, the facts in the packing flaps of the nearby victim G management of the same F F are ordered to pay the price despite having no intent or ability to pay the price despite having ordered food, and, as if the price was paid, it was ordered to pay the price to the victim a total of KRW 16,00,00, such as so-called so-called ju and so-called,

C. On the 28th of the same month, at around 20:35, the facts in the “J” restaurant operated by the victim I in the same Gu H are received by ordering the victim to food of the total amount of KRW 16,000,00, including the 1st, 1st, 1st, 1st, and 1st, etc., of the same month, as the victim would pay the price in spite of his/her intention or ability to pay the price, even if he/she orders food;

D. On the 29th of the same month, at around 20:00, the facts in the “M” restaurant operated by the victim L, which was located in the same Gu K, are ordered to provide food equivalent to KRW 14,000,000 in total, as the victim would have paid, even though he/she did not have the intent or ability to pay the price despite having ordered food, and would have received such order as if he/she had not been able to pay the price.

E. On the 31th of the same month, at around 22:00, the facts in the same place as the above sub-paragraph (d) were ordered to provide food equivalent to KRW 11,000,000, as the victim had no intent or ability to pay the price even if he/she received an order, as if he/she did not have an intent or ability to pay the price.

2. A defendant interfering with business;

A. On July 19, 2012, the “E” restaurant operating around 19:00 the victim D (n, 57 years old) around July 2012, providing meals to the victim.

arrow